Photo of Chivu Lake near the controversial Chadrakirti Memorial Park, Indo-Myanmar Border.
17 May 2020
From:
Tribal Intellectual Forum, Manipur
To:
Shri
N. Biren Singh
Chief
Minister of Manipur
Imphal,
Manipur 795001
Subject:
Urgent and open appeal to de-notify and withdraw Chibu Stone Inscription and
stop constructing Chandrakirti Memorial Park at Chivu at the Indo-Myanmar
border
Dear Hon’ble Biren Singhji:
Warmest greetings! Hope this letter find you in the
best of your health.
We, the undersigned under
the rubric of Tribal Intellectual Forum, Manipur, are deeply concerned and
disturbed over the unusual enthusiasm shown by you and your government in the
midst of Covid19 outbreak to edify and use the site of Chibu Stone Inscription
as a proxy to construct a Memorial Park after the name of the controversial
king, Chandrakirti Singh at Chivu, near Behiang in the Indo-Myanmar border.
While we appreciate and welcome your effort to promote tourism and development
through Behiang in the Indo-Myanmar border as a part of India’s Act East
Policy, your calculated move to use Chandrakirti Memorial Park as a mascot to
promote tourism and development not only contradicts your professed avowal on Chingmi-tammi
amatani (hill-valley people are one) but may also endanger inter-communal
peace, harmony, and the promotion of tourism and development at large in
Manipur. In our considered opinion, which is duly supported by dense colonial
historical records, your pet project to promote Chandrakirti Memorial Park
around the pivotal site of Chibu Stone Inscription, which is protected under
the Manipur Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and
Remains Act, 1976, stems from a willful distortion and manipulation of
history. Unless you are really keen and determined to perpetuate this
manipulated and distorted history as a proxy to snatch away tribal land, open
up a deep historical wound and willfully insult the dignity, self-respect and
pride of the tribal people, we request you to immediately abandon this project,
de-notify and withdraw the Chibu Stone Inscription under the 1976 Act mentioned
above. Please allow us to elaborate.
As you might be aware,
the Chibu Stone Inscription is founded on a blatant lie at best and a
manipulated and distorted history at worst precisely because it falsely
attributes the British’s military victory over the Lushai chiefs during the
Lushai Expedition, 1871-72 as if it was the victory of Chandrakirti Singh,
whose participation was only as a ‘contingent force’ in the Expedition. The
official signboard in Chivu falsely claims that the stone inscription erected in
1872 during the reign of Chandrakirti Singh commemorates his ‘victory over 112
rebel Lushai chiefs’. In fact, Government of Manipur (GoM) used this spurious
historical version to prevail upon the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to
recognize this and record the blatant lie that the Chibu Stone Inscription
‘records the victory of king Chandrakirti over the rebel chiefs of Lushai in AD
1872’. ASI further registers that ‘it refers to the subjugation of 112 villages
and capturing of 4 Lushai chiefs in the course of an expedition led by
Souwaijamcha Balaram Singh Major and Kangabam Cha Thangal Major assisted by one
British officer’. This blatant lie and manipulated historical version is
recorded in pp.120-21 of the book, Indian Archaeology 1987-89: A Review authored
by M.C. Joshi, the then Director General of ASI and published by ASI in 1993.
To be sure, the British’s
military expedition, famously known as the Lushai Expedition, 1871-72 is very
well documented in the colonial writings of Alexander Mackenzie, The North
East Frontier, R.G. Woodthorpe, The Lushai Expedition, and Carey and
Tuck, The Chin Hills, vol.1. There are also solid archival sources on
this historical event which showed that the Manipur contingent, drafted by the
then officiating Political Agent of Manipur, Major General W.F. Nuthall under
instruction from and command of Brigadier General G. Bourchier, the commanding
officer of the Cachar column, had never directly participated nor entered into
the Lushai Hills during the Lushai Expedition. Major General W.F. Nuthall had,
in his report on the Lushai Expedition to C.U. Aitchison, the then Secretary to
the Government of India, Foreign Department dated 12 April 1872, underscored
Bourchier’s instruction that the main task of the Manipur contingent was merely
to ‘watch’ and ‘restrain’ the “eastern Kamhow’s tribes” from joining the
‘Lushai chiefs’. Although this contingent was instructed by Brigadier General
Bourchier to headquarter themselves at Moirang and not to move beyond
Tsek-la-pi (near Moirang), the headquarters of the southern frontier posts of
Manipur, in breach of this instruction they marched far beyond this to encamp
themselves at Chivu located in what has now become the Indo-Myanmar border.
When the British completed their military expedition in early March 1872, the
Manipur contingent was asked to return to their base in Imphal. On March 7,
1872 when the Manipur contingent was about to return, one of the important
chiefs of the tribal people, Goukhothang, and his men happened to pass through
this camp whence upon Balaram and Thangal, the two majors commanding the
Manipur contingent, ‘treacherously seized’—to borrow Bourchier’s
words—Goukhothang and his men. Goukhothang subsequently died in jail in 1873.
The construction of
Chandrakirti Memorial Park at the site of Chibu Stone Inscription therefore
evokes this wounded historical past as the tribal people continue to see blood
in the hand/name of Chandrakirti Singh.
Instead of being
sensitive to this wounded historical past, and the fact that the Chibu Stone
Inscription was based on willful manipulation and distortion of history, GoM
had invoked ‘public interest’ to acquire 607.50 sq. metres of land in Chivu way
back in 1989 and protected this site by invoking the Manipur Ancient and
Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1976 in
1993. Acquisition of tribal land through deceit, willful manipulation and
distorted history is patently illegal and must be revoked immediately. Needless
to say, the land acquired by GoM on the above grounds must be restored to the
rightful owner immediately and your government should immediately abandon
Chandrakirti Memorial Park and initiate legal process for the denotification of
Chibu Stone Inscription.
We have observed with
deep concern and anguish your unusual haste to complete and inaugurate the
Chandrakirti Memorial Park in the peak of the Covid19 outbreak and national
lockdown declared by our Prime Minister Narendra Modi by sending three high
ranking state officials including two local officers from Churachandpur
district on 19 April 2020 to inspect the construction site at Chivu. We
understand that Manipur needs to promote tourism and development by taking full
advantage of the opportunities being offered by India’s Act East Policy.
However, you and your government should not, and must not, do this on the
foundation of willful manipulation and distortion of history and unless you
deliberately want to hurt the sentiments, self-respect and dignity of the local
tribal people. Any misadventure to insistently promote Chandrakirti Memorial
Park around the centerpiece of Chibu Stone Inscription would be seen as an open
and willful attempt to affront the self-respect, dignity and pride of the local
tribal people in the Indo-Myanmar borderland.
We fervently hope and
pray that you reaffirm and walk the talk of your avowed commitment to chingmi-tammi
amatani by immediately abandoning the Chandrakirti Memorial Park, de-notify
and withdraw the Chibu Stone Inscription. As insights from historical experiences
unambiguously present before us, durable development and progress in deeply
divided societies like Manipur or elsewhere in the world can only be built upon
the foundation of inter-communal peace, harmony, and mutual trust and respect.
We hope that you will weigh your choices very carefully so that posterity may
remember you favorably as one of the constructive agents who not only bridges
hills-valley divide in Manipur but also fosters development and progress.
(Prof.
Jangkhongam Doungel)
Mizoram
University
Convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Prof. Kham
Khan Suan Hausing)
University of
Hyderabad, Hyderabad
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Prof Rose
Nembiakkim Guite)
IGNOU, New
Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal Intellectual
Forum, Manipur
(Prof. L. Lam
Khan Piang)
University of
Hyderabad, Hyderabad
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr. Ngamjahao
Kipgen)
Associate
Professor
IIT, Guwahati
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr. Nemthianngai
Guite)
Associate
Professor
Jawaharlal
Nehru University, New Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr. Lianboi
Vaiphei)
Assistant
Professor
IP College,
Delhi University, Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr.
Hoineilhing Sitlhou)
Assistant
Professor
University of
Hyderabad
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr.
Thongkholal Haokip)
Assistant
Professor
Jawaharlal
Nehru University, New Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr. R. Sanga)
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(K.Vungzamoi)
Assistant
Professor
Churachandpur
College, Lamka
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr. Grace
Donnemching)
Assistant
Professor, IGNOU, Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr. A.S.
Shimreiwung)
Assistant
Professor, Tezpur University, Tezpur
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr. Mercy
Vungthianmuang Guite)
Assistant
Professor, JNU, New Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(K. Kokho)
Assistant
Professor
Jamia Milia
Islamia, New Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr Michael
Lunminthang)
Assistant
Professor
Ambedkar
University, Delhi
Co-convenor
Tribal
Intellectual Forum, Manipur
(Dr.
Roluahpuia)
Postdoctoral
Fellow
IIT, Guwahati
Co-convenor
No comments:
Post a Comment